 | | | Lucene | | Hello. Let assume I have a Document which has two fields Content_1 and
Content_2.
I am making query to find word "blabla " in the Content_1 OR Content_2.
But as a result I receive Hits collection withIn Lucene 2.x in method Lock#obtain(long lockWaitTimeout) I see the
following line
int maxSleepCount (int)(lockWaitTimeout / LOCK_POLL_INTERVAL)
Since I wanted to set the lock timeout to the lHello I tried finding information about this from past mailing list
emails but couldn 't find anything. I 'm using Lucene 1.4 series and
wondered if it is safe for two different JVMs opening and searcMy guess is you want to look into the Scorer implementations. I am
not sure Lucene 's term vector storage is needed you could just store
the terms as they always are and implement your own Query/On 6-Nov-07 at 3 02 PM Paul Elschot wrote
> On Tuesday 06 November 2007 23 14 01 Mike Klaas wrote
> > Wait--shouldn 't the outer-most BooleanQuery provide most of this
> > speedup already (since itOn Tuesday 06 November 2007 23 14 01 Mike Klaas wrote
> On 29-Oct-07 at 9 43 AM Paul Elschot wrote
> > On Friday 26 October 2007 09 36 58 Ard Schrijvers wrote
> > > +prop1 a +prop2 b +prop3 c +proHi
I want to build a custom termfreq vector an add it to the field to store it
to the index.
I want to use lucene for research I 'm thinking to make some experimentation
so I need to store a term vecOn 29-Oct-07 at 9 43 AM Paul Elschot wrote
> On Friday 26 October 2007 09 36 58 Ard Schrijvers wrote
> > +prop1 a +prop2 b +prop3 c +prop4 d +prop5 e
> >
> > is much faster than
> >
> > (+(+(+(+prop1 You would have to take the original input and re-analyze it and put it
into the TermFreqVector format. It 's just a list of terms and their
frequencies for a given doc so it should be pretty stra6 nov 2007 kl. 09.51 skrev Shailendra Mudgal
> Hi
> If while indexing we have not set this flag then is there any
> other way to
> get this info i mean the TermFreqVector for a document ??
SeeHi
If while indexing we have not set this flag then is there any other way to
get this info i mean the TermFreqVector for a document ??
On 8/3/07 testn <test1@(protected) > wrote
>
>
> you canCool.
I 'll do since this is a field which I can spend time in.
Kindly
//Marcus
On 11/5/07 Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@(protected) > wrote
>
>
> On Nov 5 2007 at 7 49 AM Marcus Herou wrote
>
> > THi All
I have an index without does not have the termFreqVector stored in it. I do
not want to recreate the index as it is a big index and took a lot of time
while creation. Is their a other way for
Hi All
We are trying to fetch the TermFreq from the lucene index using
IndexReader.getTermFreqVectors().
But the problem here is if none of the fields in the index is Vectorized
then the above fWe have an e-mail server / Calendar Server / Address book etc. And we are
planning on to use Lucene for searching through the respective stores. I am
aware that I have convert every thing in to a formHi Grant
Thanks for providing these suggestions. I will work on these directions
with my team.
Regards
Sandeep.
On 11/5/07 Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@(protected) > wrote
>
> You could search thHi Marcus
Thanks for providing these suggestions. I will work on these directions
with my team.
Regards
Sandeep.
On 11/5/07 Marcus Herou <marcus.herou@(protected) > wrote
>
> As you suggest
On Nov 5 2007 at 7 49 AM Marcus Herou wrote
> Thanks. They seem to have got real far in the dev cycle on this.
> Seems like
> it will hit the road in Solr 1.3.
>
> However I would really like Hello Group
I have a requirement in my project where I need to display related items for any select item in the group. I am not sure whether this can be possible. Let me tell you tThere are several issues here....
1 > How are you getting the entity reference? You must be encoding
the stream (or getting it encoded for you). So the first thing I 'd do
is un-encode it.
2 > After thatOn 11/5/07 Mike Streeton <mike.streeton@(protected) > wrote
> Can TermDocs be reused i.e. can you do.
>
> TermDocs docs reader.termDocs()
> docs.seek(term1)
> int i 0
> while (docs.next
Unfortunately no. Once open the IndexReader/IndexSearcher searches
a frozen "point in time " snapshot of the index as it existed when it
was first opened.
You 'll have to open a new searcher in ordHi
I have an application using Lucene 2.2.0 that opens an IndexSearcher only once to optimize performance because opening the index is a heavy operation. My question is if I modify the index with aHi!
Imagine an index holding documents in different languages and country.
Language+country is what I call a context and I build and hold a QueryFilter
for each context.
When performing a fuzzy seThanks. They seem to have got real far in the dev cycle on this. Seems like
it will hit the road in Solr 1.3.
However I would really like this feature to be developed for Core Lucene
how do I start Can TermDocs be reused i.e. can you do.
TermDocs docs reader.termDocs()
docs.seek(term1)
int i 0
while (docs.next()) {
i++
}
docs.seek(term2)
int j 0
while (docs.next()) {
As you suggest you could either roll the index on the local machine or
remote and gzip the content fileds on the archive index and provide a
GzipReader when you need to search old results.
If money iYou could search this list about distributing your indexes etc.
RemoteSearchable may be handy but you will probably have to build
some infrastructure around it for handling failover etc. (woulSorry I did a mistake in my previous email.
The field "L 'article " is indexed as "L &apos article ". The blank space is
inserted between 'L ' and '&apos article '.
Thanks
Leire
-----Message d 'origineCan you explain more of what you are trying to do? Lucene just works
with text it is up to you to extract the text from whatever format it
is in. That being said you can try searching the arch |
|
|
